Openprise recently released its 2016 MarTech Data Report, revealing that a substantial number of organizations still do not use a MAP at all (see Figure 1). There’s more, though—for those organizations that have opted-in to an automation platform, their usage of these powerful tools remains primarily basic or moderate.
Figure 1. Source: Openprise 2016 MarTech Data Report
So, what’s the problem, exactly? You might reasonably assume a lack of technology skills would be the biggest contributing factor to the 40 percent of organizations that don’t engage in any type of advanced marketing—but you’d be wrong. Budget is sometimes the culprit, but the real issue is data—inaccurate data (16 percent of respondents), lack of data (24 percent of respondents), and too much data (10 percent of respondents) all stood out in the report as key pain points for marketers. Data hygiene—that is, the quality and accuracy of the data that feeds the MarTech machines—was cited by 50 percent of MAP-adoptees as their number one challenge related to data.
According to the report, the top three MarTech priorities for 2016 were data management (43 percent), analytics (39 percent), and CRM (35 percent). For survey respondents not currently using marketing automation, the top three challenges were data management, data quality, and system integration. The same three challenges ailed those organizations that did use a MAP, just in a slightly different order.
These data hygiene challenges will be addressed, no doubt, if the MarTech hiring spree is any indication. According to the Openprise report, data management was projected to be the “top hire in 2016.” Hiring in marketing automation, though? Oddly enough, it made the bottom of the list. I think this is one area marketers will need to put some thought into as they look to the coming year. See Figure 2 below for a hiring breakdown. As you review it, think of your own company. Did your year mirror the projections, or did you take a different path?
Figure 2. Source: Openprise 2016 MarTech Data Report
I look to lead scoring as another potential MarTech priority. The data from the report shows 78 percent of those who use marketing automation use it to score leads. We all know marketing and sales have their differences, and this is no exception: When it comes to lead scoring, marketing emphasizes engagement while sales leans in to demographic data. The two can agree, however, that they’re not overly confident about their lead scoring efforts, both rating their performance at a six out of ten.
What’s crazy to me is only half of marketers who said they use MarTech for lead scoring actually leverage those efforts when it comes to lead qualification—I look for that to change in the coming year as MAP adoption goes more mainstream.
So, just how techy is your marketing department? Are you one of those forward-thinking marketers who uses a MAP or other type of MarTech? If so, what has been your experience? If not, what is holding you back? Tell me in the comments.
In this guest contribution from Steve Vonder Haar, Senior Analyst with Wainhouse, a Futurum Group…
In this guest contribution from Craig Durr, Senior Analyst with Wainhouse, a Futurum Group Company,…
Futurum's Daniel Newman dives into the recent announcement coming out of Micron, that they will…
Futurum analyst Michael Diamond recaps the Amazon Devices and Services event and reviews some of…
Futurum senior analyst Steven Dickens provides his take on the latest announcements coming out of…
Futurum’s Ron Westfall and Daniel Newman examine Micron’s financial results for the fourth quarter 2022…