But what about your professional time, when the social and other for-fun apps are silenced and you’re in productivity mode—does the importance of a great UX have to stop just because you’re using an app for work? Absolutely not. If anything, a seamless UX is even more important on the work-side, for employee morale and corporate productivity, not to mention the ability for companies to attract and retain top talent. You might say there’s a tremendously compelling business case for CIOs and IT leaders to focus on all things related to developing and maintaining great UXs for internal teams. What say you?.
Really think about this one for a minute: When was the last time you put extra effort into something you dreaded? Yeah, me neither. If your in-house interfaces are giving people headaches, it may be time to invest in a change. After all, creating great UXs for our internal teams is how we keep employees happy and the work load flowing. Caring about the UXs we create for them—which allows them to do their jobs in ways that not only make sense to them but are also enjoyable—is an important consideration for the CIO and IT team.
It’s important to remember, too, that happy staffers stick around longer and perform better, decreasing the costs associated with hiring and training new employees. More collaboration can occur in these open and positive environments, opening doors for innovation and better workflow.
According to a white paper produced by Knowledge@Wharton titled User Experience: Reimagining Productivity and Business Value, the business value (read that “profitability potential”) for exceptional UX is not only measurable—it’s pretty darn high. The paper cites research data from the Design Management Institute in Boston, showing that companies that invested in design outperformed the S&P 500 Index by over 200 percent between 2004 and 2014 (stocks tracked included heavyweights such as Disney and Starbucks).
Other monetized benefits that add to the business case for good UX include the increased use of existing software licenses, fewer time-consuming and costly errors, and quicker resolution of IT problems.
Some businesses that have shied away from a UX focus—often unintentionally, I might add—lack a clear communication among departments about what the exact UX they are creating is and what it should be. Plus, different business models and different industry needs make delivering a uniform path to great UX pretty much impossible, so it’s really up to CIOs and IT teams to evaluate what’s best and to develop some internal guidelines that are uniform across the board. With no assurance of success and some ambiguity when it comes to gathering (and measuring) metrics on UX moves, some businesses are hesitant to take the first step.
Those hesitant businesses? Perhaps they need to be reminded that when success with UX overhaul comes, it comes big. Knowledge@Wharton’s white paper mentioned above contains three case studies of companies with an exceptional and effective approach to UX and the benefits they enjoyed:
This discussion sounds good on a conceptual level? After all, considering the end user—whether designing custom or choosing cookie cutter internal IT—seems like a no-brainer. Well, whether it is or isn’t, the fact remains that there are a lot of businesses out there that are still failing their employees when it comes to day-to-day technology UX. So, what can we do about it? According to the white paper I mentioned above, there are a few key components of a good UX. To make this actionable, ask yourself the following about your current employee IT interface:
If your answers to any of the above are negative, those are key areas to address immediately.
If you’re still on the fence about whether investing in UX is worthwhile, step back and take a look at your IT efforts from a big picture perspective. Do your employees consistently use company software, or do they give up and use their own applications, exposing your organization to Shadow IT and its potential for security breaches? Do they blame internal IT for costly losses or delays? What about turnover—if it’s high, have you considered poor UX as a potential reason or at a minimum, a contributing factor?
Perhaps what is needed is a simple comparison: If you were using an application on your personal time and it had a similar UX as the one offered by your internal software, would you keep it or find a better alternative? The business value is there for good UX, and it’s worth our time to reexamine how we’re approaching it with our internal teams.
What do you think? Is internal UX at the forefront of your organization? Or something that’s barely given a second thought? Do you have tips for UX success? Any horror stories? I’d love to hear your thoughts on this topic.
Additional Resources on this Topic:
Perils of Shadow IT: Most Senior Executives are Doing it (ask Hillary)
The Important User Experience You’re Probably Ignoring
Corporate Employee Apps: Does User Experience Matter?
Photo Credit: Negativespace.co
In this guest contribution from Steve Vonder Haar, Senior Analyst with Wainhouse, a Futurum Group…
In this guest contribution from Craig Durr, Senior Analyst with Wainhouse, a Futurum Group Company,…
Futurum's Daniel Newman dives into the recent announcement coming out of Micron, that they will…
Futurum analyst Michael Diamond recaps the Amazon Devices and Services event and reviews some of…
Futurum senior analyst Steven Dickens provides his take on the latest announcements coming out of…
Futurum’s Ron Westfall and Daniel Newman examine Micron’s financial results for the fourth quarter 2022…